Radical Common Sense To Prevent Crime
Guest Feature by Greg Saville
When Steve asked me to contribute to this blog a line from a famous play came to mind. With apologies to Skakespeare: If our prevention cause is just and our method of achieving it honorable, “methinks I could not die anywhere so contented as in the king’s company”. Steve will no doubt shudder at being prevention king. But I think he’ll agree with my message. It is called SafeGrowth.
It boils down to this:
1. There is a cloud of confusion obstructing clear-headed thinking when it comes to crime. We must deal with facts, not ideology.
2. We cannot arrest, imprison, or target harden our way out of crime.
3. There is no point in creating a safe physical place if people are disengaged from community life.
4. Crime is best tackled in the neighbourhood by harnessing the creativity and energy of neighbourhood dwellers and functional neighbourhood groups.
SafeGrowth relates to an idea rediscovered by writer Jane Jacobs – the success of a city is based in small neighbourhoods. It includes success in reducing crime.
In SafeGrowth neighbours create their own annual, measurable, safety plan. Every SafeGrowth plan uses diagnostic techniques: a crime risk matrix, crime mapping and asset mapping, safety audits, and other methods of crime prevention science.
Putting SafeGrowth into practice is not easy. How do we get neighbourhoods activated? Who wants to go to more meetings? Why can’t the police just do their job? These are the obstacles we must overcome.
One way to do that is to use radical common sense.
http://safe-growth.blogspot.com/2009/08/radical-common-sense.html
This is the idea that we cannot solve our deepest problems through traditional ways. This means accepting the criminal justice system as an adversarial, blunt tool. Instead our future exists in cooperating, sharing best practices, and accepting that our fate is tied to that of others.
Also, we must vote for provincial and federal leaders who will better resource municipalities. In turn, municipalities must refine, or create, a network of geographical neighbourhoods. They must upskill neighbourhood groups to develop annual safety plans in cooperation with service providers.
Embryonic SafeGrowth neighbourhoods are already underway in Toronto’s Jane/Finch,
http://safe-growth.blogspot.com/2009/06/waking-up-to-21st-century-prevention.html
in Saskatoon,
http://safe-growth.blogspot.com/2009/05/doin-it-right-on-wrong-side-of-town.html
and Detroit’s Central Woodward neighbourhood in the U.S.
http://www.detroit-lisc.org/display.aspx?pointer=9122
This is radical common sense in the 21st Century. Join Steve and myself in helping make this happen where you live and work.
2 comments2 Comments so far
Leave a reply
This idea sounds good and wonderful to me. But common sense is tied to moral beliefs and neighbourhoods are not the homogeneous groups that they used to be. I long for the security of a caring community that used to be found in neighbourhoods but is it possible when common sense is no longer common? Learning about and accepting each other are certainly key elements so that the “common” part of this statement holds a place in the neighbourhood.
Very true Louise. Thanks for that important perspective. But notice the phrase “radical” in front of the term “common sense”? That is because I argue the common sense of old really isn’t all that common nowadays – in fact, I’d argue it never has been that common. So as a result, what SafeGrowth aims to create is precisely that very neighbourhood learning environment to allow local folks to start defining their own standards (and expectations) of safety and security. Is that possible? I certainly hope so, because that is the most basic requisite for safe community life in the years to come.